Governance within an organization establishes the foundation for readiness, but trust demands that boards and executives demonstrate accountability to external stakeholders, including regulators, investors, and the public. In today’s digital landscape, trust—once rooted in reliable products and service—is increasingly shaped by how organizations govern data, manage digital risks, and ensure compliance.
From 2024 to 2025, 32% of data breaches resulted in fines, highlighting the critical need for proactive measures. Cybersecurity extends beyond perimeter defense; it’s about accountability and maintaining confidence across relationships with customers, employees, investors, and regulators.
Organizations that treat cybersecurity as a shared responsibility, integrating leadership, management, and external partners, are better equipped to help ensure continuity and credibility during challenges.
Regulatory compliance and stakeholder confidence
Disclosure and privacy requirements reflect the expectations of regulators, clients, employees, and investors. Compliance is just the baseline—true accountability requires treating these obligations as ongoing discipline. Falling short risks not only fines but also stalled growth, damaged relationships, and weakened confidence among stakeholders.
Key dynamics shaping today’s regulatory landscape include:
- Disclosure obligations – SEC rules require publicly traded companies to report material cyber incidents promptly, with enforcement extending to directors and executives. Failures can trigger penalties, shareholder litigation, and D&O claims.
- Privacy and biometric statutes – Laws, such as California’s CCPA/CPRA and Illinois’ BIPA, have spurred costly litigation. Similar frameworks are emerging nationwide, often leading to class action lawsuits and reputational harm.
- Sector-specific mandates – Infrastructure, financial services, and healthcare face heightened requirements where shortfalls can lead to fines, restricted access to markets, or operational disruption.
- Global compliance – The EU’s GDPR and emerging AI regulations continue to raise international standards, creating fragmented frameworks and heightened scrutiny of data governance.
For leaders, the path forward is clear: treat compliance not as a minimum standard, but as a cornerstone for building trust.
Executive oversight in the digital era
Boards and executives now sit at the center of cyber governance. Fiduciary duties extend beyond financial performance to oversight of operational continuity, data protection, and stakeholder confidence. 77% of directors now discuss the material and financial implications of cyber incidents—a 25% increase from 2022.
Coordinate coverage and crisis response
Maintaining trust depends on how an organization conducts itself under pressure. Regulators, boards, employees, and customers will judge a business by its discipline during a cyber incident—the clarity of its decisions, the credibility of its communications, and the consistency of its documentation. 81% of organizations with an incident response (IR) retainer had to use it one or more times in the last 12 months.
View our cyber event playbook to learn what to do and what not to do during a cyber incident.
Best practices for maintaining stakeholder trust
Relational trust is built by embedding privacy, governance, and preparedness into daily operations. Organizations can reinforce confidence without adding friction by:
- Mapping regulatory obligations and reporting deadlines
- Embedding data minimization, consent, and privacy-by-design
- Extending governance to biometric and AI use cases
- Establishing evidence preservation protocols
- Rehearsing disclosures and tabletop simulations
- Aligning coverage strategy
- Tracking and reporting progress
- Aligning coverage strategy
The role of trusted partners
External partners provide the expertise and validation needed most when governance and credibility are tested:
- Insurance advisor – Turns complex regulatory and insurer expectations into actionable steps that build confidence with stakeholders and strengthen coverage.
- Insurance company partner – Provides access to forensics, counsel, and communications experts while offering guidance that sharpens governance and improves claims outcomes.
- Incident response – Brings forensic rigor and communication support before and during crises, demonstrating transparency and discipline to regulators, boards, and the public.
Stakeholder trust may be tested in moments of disruption, but with the right partners at the table, organizations can maintain confidence, limit impact, and protect reputation when it matters most.
Your next step toward cyber resilience
Preserving stakeholder trust requires more than compliance—it demands governance discipline, accountable leadership, and tested crisis response.
Explore our practical resources:
- Stakeholder trust checklist – Benchmark governance practices and identify readiness gaps.
- AI governance checklist – Evaluate how your organization manages emerging risks tied to AI.
- Cyber events insurance guide – Understand how coverage supports response and recovery.
This document is intended for general information purposes only and should not be construed as advice or opinions on any specific facts or circumstances. The content of this document is made available on an “as is” basis, without warranty of any kind. The Baldwin Insurance Group Holdings, LLC (“The Baldwin Group”), its affiliates, and subsidiaries do not guarantee that this information is, or can be relied on for, compliance with any law or regulation, assurance against preventable losses, or freedom from legal liability. This publication is not intended to be legal, underwriting, or any other type of professional advice. The Baldwin Group does not guarantee any particular outcome and makes no commitment to update any information herein or remove any items that are no longer accurate or complete. Furthermore, The Baldwin Group does not assume any liability to any person or organization for loss or damage caused by or resulting from any reliance placed on that content. Persons requiring advice should always consult an independent adviser.